Teachers picked to mark this year’s Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) examinations were first made to sit the same papers they were to mark.
Unlike in the past when the selected national markers would sit down with the setter of the papers to discuss the answers, this time round, the markers's proficiency was tested by the Kenya National Examination Council (Knec) chiefs.
Reliable sources at the national marking centres narrated to The Standard how markers for respective papers were tested for proficiency before being allowed to proceed with the exercise.
A senior KCSE marker who took part in the examinations said those who failed to score at least 95 per cent were discontinued. The rules were very tight for key subjects such as Maths and English, Physics, Chemistry and Biology.
Pre-qualification
"The overriding concern was that there was no way a marker who did not get all the answers right could mark the paper," he told The Standard in Kisumu yesterday.
Not even the chief examiner was spared. Sources disclosed they were the first to sit the KCSE papers in a process dubbed pre-qualification.
The exercise took four days after the selected markers reported to the various national marking stations.
The chief examiner's test was marked by the setter before he administered the same test to all his assistants.
After that, he met the assistant chief examiners (ACEs) to discuss the paper and the marking scheme. This was done to allow the chief and ACEs to agree on the marking procedure.
"Thereafter, they met the various team leaders numbering about 100 to discuss the paper and then, under the guidance of chief examiners and ACEs, conducted the same tests on the team leaders," he said.
The team leaders' tests were marked by the ACEs who then retreated to discuss each question and possible answers alongside those prescribed in the marking schemes for any necessary amendments.
It is after this that the close to 1,200 markers were asked to report to the marking centres and made to sit the paper.
Team leaders were divided into about six or eight groups, whose members were expected to mark about 580 papers per person.
The markers and the team leaders also had to discuss the questions and their answers as provided in the marking schemes.
During the discussions, markers were allowed to include alternative answers that were not in the marking schemes, like methods used in calculations.
The markers were then subjected to marking of dummies or photocopies of the papers.
These dummies had already been marked by chief examiners, ACEs and team leaders and common scores arrived at.
Each of the markers are required to state how they arrived at each of the marks awarded to the candidates. Time is then allowed for criticism.
After marking about 12 dummies, the examiners would then again sit for a pre-test.
At this stage, they were expected to mark at least three dummies to be recorded as pre-test.
Again, the outcome was discussed with each of the team leaders. After the pre-test, the papers were remarked again to ascertain if the marks awarded were right.
The purpose of remarking was to ascertain if the candidate deserved what the examiners had given. For instance, if a marker gave a candidate 60 or 80 per cent, would a remark reproduce the same score if done by a new examiner?
In the event the marks deviated, the markers would be disqualified and requested to leave.
The rule of thumb was that there was no way a paper could be marked by about eight people producing similar results only for
Scholarship 2026/27
Current Scholarships 2026/2027 - Fully Funded
Full Undergraduate Scholarships 2026 - 2027
Fully Funded Masters Scholarships 2026 - 27
PhD Scholarships for International Students - Fully Funded!
Funding Opportunities for Journalists 2026/2027
Funding for Entrepreneurs 2026/2027
***