The Principal Secretary for Education, Dr. Belio Kipsang has asked stakeholders in Education to review the ranking of students and schools during announcement of national examinations.
He said the ranking of schools and even students in order of merit in national examinations exerted enormous pressures on schools and students, thereby tempting teachers to focus on passing examinations of students, instead of providing holistic education that the Government wants children to have.
The suggestion has been well received going by responses the PS remarks have elicited in the mainstream media and the social media.
In calling for a review of the administration of examinations, the Principal Secretary did not suggest the abolition of the National Examinations that students undertake at the end of the primary and secondary education cycle.
He was calling for several things chief among them, the withdrawal of the statistical information about the best students and the best schools.
This ranking has always formed the substance of the announcement of national examinations results, and which schools have, by default, commercialized to advertise their schools.
The unwritten rule in administration of national examinations is that: “if your school does not appear in the newspapers, and preferably at the top of the pack, you are not good enough.”
And appearance in the national media appears to give the schools and the teachers some mileage which has little to do with the goals and objectives of education as we know it.
The logical consequence of this has been that some unscrupulous school administrations prefer what experts in educational assessment called item-teaching to curriculum teaching.
In item-teaching, teachers are said to organize their instruction either around the actual items found on a test or around a set of look-alike items.
On the other hand, Curriculum-teaching, however, requires teachers to direct their instruction toward a specific body of content knowledge or a specific set of cognitive skills represented by a given test according to W. James Popham, professor emeritus at University of California Graduate School of Education and Information Studies and a recognized expert on educational assessment.
Item teaching does not provide expose the students to impart the depth and breadth of knowledge, and skills learners need to develop the analytical, creative and problem solving skills that they need to tackle examinations.
It is these skills— applicable across all disciplines—that define quality education and which in turn transform learners into effective citizens, and prospective employers and entrepreneurs. Stakeholders have claimed that our examination system is examination oriented.
If it examination oriented, it so by default, by the serious dereliction of duty on the part of School administrations and teachers.
The prescribed curriculum the Ministry of Education has designed, in conjunction with the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD) is relatively speaking rich in intellectual rigour.
It also provides for the development of the emotional and behavioral domains of the learners as well as their psychomotor skills.
The policy documents that guide curriculum development is clear about the educational outcomes of learners at the end of every education cycle.
The policy guidelines have spelled out the specific skills, and competencies which the curriculum
Scholarship 2026/27
Current Scholarships 2026/2027 - Fully Funded
Full Undergraduate Scholarships 2026 - 2027
Fully Funded Masters Scholarships 2026 - 27
PhD Scholarships for International Students - Fully Funded!
Funding Opportunities for Journalists 2026/2027
Funding for Entrepreneurs 2026/2027
***